Implicit within each of these terms is the valuable work of volunteers, and beyond that, a leader of volunteers will in most cases also be present, it was just that for those at the conference there seemed very little need to spell that out.

When considering terminology, we should also think about the often under representation of volunteers and volunteer leaders from the areas of recreation, sport, the environment and emergency services at mainstream events such as national volunteering conferences and advanced volunteer management training. Is this because they simply don’t want to attend, or do they see what they do as being something different to what mainstream volunteering has to offer?

Let’s look at just one aspect of this involvement – namely men as volunteers. Susan Ellis made the point some years ago that “men have always volunteered, they are just usually referred to as coaches, fire fighters, pro bono lawyers, scout leaders and so on”.

It is not that men don’t volunteer (here in Australia the ration of women to men is not far off a 50/50 split) they just label it differently. The same is true of other groups who contribute voluntary time - parent helpers in schools and teachers in Sunday school being just two that spring immediately to mind.

Now here’s the point of this hot topic, and the question I’d like to pose to each and every reader – does it matter that the work of volunteers is not titled volunteering?

From one perspective, and this is the reality, it is never going to happen - so perhaps it is a null and void argument to begin with. However, it does raise a number of interesting points of view that are worth exploring.

There are really two points of view which need to be considered.

The first of those argues that we should work a lot harder to ensure that the work of everyone acting in a voluntary capacity somehow gets ‘captured’ under the volunteering title. It surely stands to reason that if we are better able to gather these numbers together, the overall impact of volunteers will be better understood and volunteering as a whole will be better off – right?

Well here are a couple of key questions.

For me, one of the reasons I get a little ‘miffed’ at people not properly understanding the scope of volunteerism, is because it is in some ways a hindrance to the advancement of volunteer management as a profession. But in the same way that volunteers are often pigeon holed, so too is the work of volunteer managers in many of those same fields

For instance, to pick up Susan Ellis’ example again, volunteer coaches are more likely to work under the guidance of someone with the title ‘sports coordinator’ rather than volunteer manager. Fire fighters may work under a Captain or team leader, parent class helpers under a teacher. All these people are leading volunteer effort and like their volunteers have probably never thought of themselves as a volunteer manager or part of the profession of volunteer management.

This brings me nicely to the second perspective we should discuss - and that is this. Perhaps those of us in the ‘mainstream’ volunteerism sector actually need to get better at finding ways to link in with others who are volunteers or who are leading volunteer effort without getting too precious about the terminology we use to describe what we are all doing. After all, if volunteering (by whatever name) is taking place and people are benefitting from it, surely that is the most important point.

It seems to me that our main strategy over the years has simply been to grumble about the low representation of these groups and do very little about it, but surely there must be other ways to educate about the sheer volume and scope of volunteer work in all it’s forms than simply forever trying to bundle it all up as ‘volunteering’. Because let’s face it, if Mohammed won’t come to the mountain perhaps it is time we went to Mohammed!

So here are some questions I’d love to hear your thoughts on:

• Firstly, do you agree with my sentiments or vehemently disagree? Why / Why not?